&北京赛车PK10，全网最高，全国最大微信群
登录微信群
我的位置： & (群满员可加群主)
发布时间：
简介：北京赛车微信群，高赔率北京赛车，高信誉
&北京赛车微信群，高赔率北京赛...
介绍：北京赛车微信群，高赔率北京赛车，高信誉
&北京赛车微信群，高赔率北京赛车，高信誉
&御龙会所北京赛车，幸运飞艇，带你们飞
& 有一种质量叫“回头客
& 有一种实力叫“百万秒回
& 有一种信任叫“我就相信你”
&有一个实力赛车群，它叫---【御龙赛车】
&北京赛车微信群，高赔率北京赛车，高信誉
&玩的老板加微信PK105555
公告：二维码内容均为会员自行发布，我们仅提供一个展示、交流的平台，不对其内容的准确性、真实性、正当性、合法性负责，也不承担任何法律责任。请警惕信息真假，谨慎向陌生人打款，此站只为提供信息发布平台，不做任何双方证明和承担任何法律责任，如有被骗遭遇可提供截图证明，我们立即删除并严肃处理
你可能对下面的微信群也感兴趣
本周给力排行
红包活动资讯
微信红包群为用户免费分享产生 微信红包群版权所有.沪ICP备号-25
微信红包群分类：
微信号：ly12315ly279365人阅读
本文地址：
提示：请直接按CTRL+F搜索您要查找的转义字符。
quotation mark = APL quote
less-than sign
greater-than sign
no-break space = non-breaking space
iSO 8859-1 characters
char glyph
Math symbols
Latin Extended-B
char glyph
char glyph
Mathematical Operators
char glyph
General Punctuation
char glyph
Miscellaneous Technical
char glyph
Geometric Shapes
char glyph
Miscellaneous Symbols
char glyph
Letterlike Symbols
char glyph
char glyph
Special characters for HTML
C0 Controls and Basic Latin
char glyph
Latin Extended-A
char glyph
Spacing Modifier Letters
char glyph
General Punctuation
char glyph
&&相关文章推荐
参考知识库
* 以上用户言论只代表其个人观点，不代表CSDN网站的观点或立场
访问：1569122次
积分：13810
积分：13810
排名：第798名
原创：326篇
转载：127篇
评论：377条
(4)(2)(6)(1)(1)(7)(3)(4)(6)(1)(2)(3)(1)(5)(4)(8)(6)(2)(4)(1)(6)(11)(11)(15)(15)(16)(18)(29)(13)(29)(23)(19)(27)(16)(21)(23)(11)(9)(22)(20)(5)(1)(4)(1)(10)(9)I started using a diagnostic css stylesheet, e.g.
One of the suggested rules highlights input tags with the type submit, with the recommendation to use &button& as a more semantic solution.
This is a new tag to me, do you guys recommend it, or are there disadvantages (such as with browser compatibility) that you have run across?
Just to be clear, I understand the spec of &button&, it has a defined start and end, it can contain various elements, whereas input is a singlet and can't contain stuff.
What I want to know essentially is whether it's broken or not.
So despite never having used it before, I'd love to start using it, I just don't know how well it works in the real world.
The first answer below does seem to imply that it is broken for uses except outside of forms, unfortunately.
Edit for 2015
The landscape has changed!
I have 6 more years experience of dealing with button now, and browsers have somewhat moved on from IE6 and IE7.
So I'll add an answer that details what I found out and what I suggest.
解决方案 Answering from an ASP.NET perspective.
I was excited when I found
and some code for a ModernButton control, which, in the end, is a &button& control.
So I started adding all sorts of these buttons, decorated with &img /& tags inside of them to make them stand out.
And it all worked great... in Firefox, and Chrome.
Then I tried IE6 and got the "a potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected", because IE6 submits the html inside of the button, which, in my case, has html tags in it.
I don't want to disable the validateRequest flag, because I like this added bit of data validation.
So then I wrote some javascript to disable that button before the submit occurred.
Worked great in a test page, with one button, but when I tried it out on a real page, that had other &button& tags, it blew up again.
Because IE6 submits ALL of the buttons' html.
So now I have all sorts of code to disable buttons before submit.
Same problems with IE7.
IE8 thankfully has this fixed.
I'd recommend not going down this road IF you are using ASP.NET.
I found a library out there that looks promising to fix this.
If you use the ie8.js script from this library:
It might work out just fine.
The IE8.js brings IE5-7 up to speed with IE8 with the button tag. It makes the submitted value the real value and only one button gets submitted.
本文地址： &
我开始使用诊断css样式表，例如
其中一个建议规则突出显示具有类型提交的输入标签，并建议使用& button& 作为更多的语义解决方案。这是一个新的标签给我，你们推荐它，还是有缺点（如与浏览器兼容性），你经历了？
只是为了清楚，我理解& button& 的规范，它有一个定义的开始和结束，它可以包含各种元素，而input是一个单例，不能包含东西。我想知道的基本上是是否破碎。所以尽管从来没有使用它，我很想开始使用它，我只是不知道它在现实世界中是如何工作。
2015年的编辑
景观已经改变！我有6年以上的处理按钮的经验，现在的浏览器有点移动从IE6和IE7。因此，我将补充一个答案，详细说明我发现的内容和我的建议。
当我发现和一些用于ModernButton控件的代码，最后是一个& button& 控件。
所以我开始添加各种类型的按钮，用& img /& 他们让他们脱颖而出。然后我试过IE6，并得到“一个潜在危险的Request.Form值被检测到”，因为IE6提交html里面的按钮，在我的case，有html标签。我不想禁用validateRequest标志，因为我喜欢这个添加位的数据验证。
然后我写了一些javascript，在提交之前禁用该按钮。在一个测试页面中使用一个按钮，但是当我试图在一个真实的页面，有其他& button& 标签，它再次爆炸。因为IE6提交了所有的按钮的html。所以现在我有各种代码在提交之前禁用按钮。
与IE7相同的问题。 IE8很高兴有这个固定的。
Yikes。如果您使用ASP.NET，我建议您不要这样做。
我发现一个看起来很有希望修复这个问题的库。
如果你使用这个库中的ie8.js脚本：
它可能工作得很好。 IE8.js带来IE5-7加速与IE8与按钮标签。它使提交的值为真实值，只有一个按钮被提交。
本文地址： &
扫一扫关注官方微信}