Ease of Doing Business in
United Arab Emirates
This page summarizes Doing Business 2016 data for the United Arab Emirates. The first section presents the Ease of Doing Business rank (out of 189 economies) and the distance to frontier (DTF)** measure, overall and by topic. The second section summarizes the key indicators for each topic benchmarked against regional averages.
Economy Overview
Select All
Economy Summary
Starting a Business
Dealing with Construction Permits
Getting Electricity
Registering Property
Getting Credit
Protecting Minority Investors
Paying Taxes
Trading Across Borders
Enforcing Contracts
Resolving Insolvency
Middle East & North Africa
Income Category
High income
Population
GNI Per Capita (US$)
City covered
Doing Business 2016 Rank
Doing Business 2015 Rank
DOING BUSINESS 2015 RANK
Last year's rankings are adjusted. They are based on 10 topics and reflect .
Change in Rank
Doing Business 2016 DTF (% points)
DISTANCE TO FRONTIER SCORE
The distance to frontier score shows how far on average an economy is at a point in time from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator since 2005 or the third year in which data for the indicator were collected. The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the frontier.
Doing Business 2015 DTF (% points)
DISTANCE TO FRONTIER SCORE
The distance to frontier score shows how far on average an economy is at a point in time from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator since 2005 or the third year in which data for the indicator were collected. The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the frontier.
Change in DTF (% points)
DISTANCE TO FRONTIER SCORE
The distance to frontier score shows how far on average an economy is at a point in time from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator since 2005 or the third year in which data for the indicator were collected. The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the frontier.
DB 2016 DTF (% points)
DB 2015 DTF (% points)
Change in DTF (% points)
=Doing Business reform making it easier to do business. =Change making it more difficult to do business.
Doing Business Resources
Economy Profile
1512.3KB pdf file
&Get all Data
&Law Library
&Contributors
Additional Topic
Additional Data
Related Websites
Starting a Business
DB 2016&Rank
DB 2015&Rank
DOING BUSINESS 2015 RANK
Last year's rankings are adjusted. They are based on 10 topics and reflect .
Change in Rank
DB 2016&DTF (% points)
DISTANCE TO FRONTIER SCORE
The distance to frontier score shows how far on average an economy is at a point in time from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator since 2005 or the third year in which data for the indicator were collected. The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the frontier.
DB 2015&DTF (% points)
DISTANCE TO FRONTIER SCORE
The distance to frontier score shows how far on average an economy is at a point in time from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator since 2005 or the third year in which data for the indicator were collected. The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the frontier.
Change in DTF (% points)
DISTANCE TO FRONTIER SCORE
The distance to frontier score shows how far on average an economy is at a point in time from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator since 2005 or the third year in which data for the indicator were collected. The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the frontier.
Information on new business density and number of newly created firms with limited liability can be found at .
United Arab Emirates
Middle East & North Africa
OECD high income
Procedures (number)
Procedures (number)
The total number of procedures required to register a firm. A procedure is defined as any interaction of the company founders with external parties (for example, government agencies, lawyers, auditors or notaries).
Time (days)
Time (days)
The total number of days required to register a firm. The measure captures the median duration that incorporation lawyers indicate is necessary to complete a procedure with minimum follow-up with government agencies and no extra payments.
Cost (% of income per capita)
Cost (% of income per capita)
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the economy’s income per capita. It includes all official fees and fees for legal or professional services if such services are required by law.
Paid-in min. capital (% of income per capita)
Paid-in min. capital (% of income per capita)
The amount that the entrepreneur needs to deposit in a bank or with a notary before registration and up to 3 months following incorporation and is recorded as a percentage of the economy’s income per capita.
Time to Complete
Associated Costs
Reserve a company name and Apply for registration at the Department of Economic Development (DED)
AED 110 for initial approval + AED 210 for name reservation
Notarize the company’s Memorandum of Association at DED
0.25% of the capital (for 3 copies of the Memorandum of Association), AED 5 for each page of the additional copy
File company documents with the Department for Economic Development (DED); Obtain trade license and Register for membership at the Dubai Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DCCI)
see procedure details
Apply for the establishment card at the Ministry of Labor
Register native workers with the Ministry of Labor
Register native workers with the General Authority for Pension and Social Security
1 day (simultaneous with previous procedure)
&&* Takes place simultaneously with another procedure.
Explore Economy Data
Select an economy
Afghanistan
Antigua and Barbuda
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bangladesh
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brunei Darussalam
Burkina Faso
Cabo Verde
Central African Republic
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Congo, Rep.
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Czech Republic
Dominican Republic
Egypt, Arab Rep.
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Gambia, The
Guinea-Bissau
Hong Kong SAR, China
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Kazakhstan
Korea, Rep.
Kyrgyz Republic
Luxembourg
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
Montenegro
Mozambique
Netherlands
New Zealand
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Puerto Rico (U.S.)
Russian Federation
San Marino
São Tomé and Príncipe
Saudi Arabia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Slovak Republic
Solomon Islands
South Africa
South Sudan
St. Kitts and Nevis
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan, China
Tajikistan
Timor-Leste
Trinidad and Tobago
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uzbekistan
Venezuela, RB
West Bank and Gaza
Yemen, Rep.
Select a topic
     Starting a Business
     Dealing with Construction Permits
     Getting Electricity
     Registering Property
     Getting Credit
     Protecting Minority Investors
     Paying Taxes
     Trading Across Borders
     Enforcing Contracts
     Resolving Insolvency
Additional Topic
     Labor Market Regulation
OTHER OPTIONS
United Arab EmiratesPRESS RELEASE
Remittances to developing countries to stay robust this year, despite increased deportations of migrant workers, says WB
WASHINGTON, April 11, 2014 – International migrants from developing countries are expected to send $436 billion in remittances to their home countries this year, despite more deportations from some host countries, says the World Bank’s latest issue of the Migration and Development Brief, released today.
This year’s remittance flows to developing countries will be an increase of 7.8 percent over the 2013 volume of $404 billion, rising to $516 billion in 2016, according to revised projections from the latest issue of the brief. Global remittances, including those to high-income countries, are estimated at $581 billion this year, from $542 billion in 2013, rising to $681 billion in 2016.
Remittances remain a key source of external resource flows for developing countries, far exceeding official development assistance and more stable than private debt and portfolio equity flows. For many developing countries, remittances are an important source of foreign exchange, surpassing earnings from major exports, and covering a substantial portion of imports. For example, in Nepal, remittances are nearly double the country’s revenues from exports of goods and services, while in Sri Lanka and the Philippines, they are over 50 per cent and 38 percent, respectively. In India, remittances during 2013 were $70 billion, more than the $65 billion earned from the country’s flagship software services exports. In Uganda, remittances are double the country’s income from its main export of coffee.
&Remittances have become a major component of the balance of payments of nations. India led the chart of remittance flows, receiving $70 billion last year, followed by China with $60 billion and the Philippines with $25 billion. There is no doubt that these flows act as an antidote to poverty and promote prosperity. Remittances and migration data are also barometers of global peace and turmoil and this is what makes World Bank’s KNOMAD initiative to organize, analyze, and make available these data so important,& said Kaushik Basu, Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of the World Bank.
The brief notes that while the medium term outlook for remittances is strong, downside risks loom mainly from migrants’ return to their home countries as a result of conflict or deportation from host countries. Last year saw an intensification of deportations, with more than 370,000 migrants sent back to their home countries from Saudi Arabia alone in the five months since November 2013. Many of these migrants were from Ethiopia, Egypt and Yemen. In the US, over 368,000 people (mostly migrants seeking entry into the US and apprehended at the border) were deported to their home countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), particularly Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.
In addition, asylum-seekers have surged, as a result of strife and conflict.& According to a recent report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), asylum claims in 44 industrialized countries reached 612,700 in 2013, a 28 percent increase over 2012, and the second highest level in the past 20 years. In Europe, the number of asylum applications rose by 32 percent to 484,560 in 2013, with Germany the largest recipient of asylum requests (109,600). The vast majority of asylum applicants are from Syria, Russia, Serbia and Kosovo.&
This trend is accompanied by a rise in anti-immigration sentiment, which appears to be gaining momentum in several European countries, including France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. In Switzerland, a referendum held in February 2014 on imposing immigration quotas passed, albeit with a slim majority.
During 2013, remittance flows were generally robust in all regions except LAC, and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), where the two largest remittance-recipient countries, Mexico and Egypt, saw declines in remittance inflows, due in part to removals and deportations from the US and Saudi Arabia, respectively. However, both countries retained their rankings in the top 10 remittance-receiving countries globally.
India remained in the top spot, with $70 billion in remittances in 2013. Other large recipients were China ($60 billion), the Philippines ($25 billion), Mexico ($22 billion), Nigeria ($21 billion), Egypt ($17 billion), Pakistan ($15 billion), Bangladesh ($14 billion), Vietnam ($11 billion) and Ukraine ($10 billion).
In terms of remittances as a share of GDP, the top recipients were Tajikistan (52 percent), Kyrgyz Republic (31 percent), Nepal and Moldova (both 25 percent), Samoa and Lesotho (both 23 percent), Armenia and Haiti (both 21 percent), Liberia (20 percent) and Kosovo (17 percent).
“In addition to the large annual flows of remittances, migrants living in high income countries are estimated to hold savings in excess of $500 billion annually. These savings represent a huge pool of funds that developing countries can do much more to tap into,” said Dilip Ratha, Manager of the Migration and Remittances Team at the Bank’s Development Prospects Group.
Nigeria is readying a diaspora bond issue to mobilize diaspora savings and boost financing for development.
Continued efforts are required to lower the cost of sending money through official channels, although inroads are being made. During the first quarter, the global average cost for sending money fell to 8.4 percent of the transaction value, compared with 9.1 percent a year earlier. However, the average cost of remittances to Sub-Saharan Africa has remained stubbornly high at around 12 percent. Also, South-South remittances, which are on the rise, are in many cases either not permitted or very costly due to outward exchange controls in many developing countries, such as Gambia, Ghana and Venezuela.
The closure of bank accounts of money transfer operators serving Somalia and other fragile countries is also worrying, notes the brief. Remittances provide a lifeline to ‘fragile and conflict-affected situations’ where they are more than 5 times larger than foreign aid, foreign direct investment and other sources of international finance. More needs to be done to ensure that anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regulations do not unduly undermine development objectives and harm the poor.
“As development experts debate the post-2015 agenda, they also need to turn their attention to reducing the high cost of migration, particularly exorbitant fees paid by low-skilled workers to recruitment agents to secure jobs overseas,” said Ratha.
Recognizing the close links between migration and development, the World Bank Group is deepening its engagement on the issue. Central to its involvement is its leading role in establishing and advancing the Global Knowledge Partnership on Migration and Development (KNOMAD) program, which is envisaged as a hub of knowledge and policy expertise on migration. KNOMAD’s work program is undertaken through 12 thematic working groups: low- integration issues policy and ins migrant rights and social
and internal migration. It also covers four cross cutting themes: gender, monitoring and evaluation, capacity building, and public perceptions.
Regional Trends
Remittances to the East Asia and the Pacific (EAP) region are estimated to have risen by 4.8 percent in 2013 to reach $112 billion, with Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines seeing robust growth. Substantial movement of people continues within the region, driven in large part by persistent disparities in opportunities and incomes. While low-skilled workers account for the majority of migration, the need for high-skilled workers is growing in the region. With free mobility of high skilled workers within ASEAN countries expected to be introduced in 2015, remittance flows are forecast to exceed $148 billion by 2016.
In Europe and Central Asia (ECA), remittances rebounded from the slowdown in 2012, expanding by 10 percent in 2013 to reach $43 billion. Firm oil prices through 2013 helped fuel Russia’s economy, which is the largest source of remittances sent to the other countries in the region. The crisis in Ukraine has precipitated a substantial depreciation of the ruble so far in 2014, and brings substantial uncertainty to projections through 2016.&&&
Remittance flows to countries in the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region grew slightly by 1.9 percent in 2013 to reach $61 billion. Following a 13-month decline, remittance flows to the region began recovering in the second half of 2013. However, remittances to Mexico, the largest remittance-recipient country in the region, contracted in 2013. The positive impetus from the US economic recovery was partly offset by removals of migrants from the US. The economic slowdown and unemployment in Spain and Italy, which are also large destinations of Latin American migrants, contributed to the slowdown in remittances to the region. In the medium term, improving employment conditions in the US point to stronger growth in remittances, which are expected to reach $81 billion by 2016.
In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, remittances are estimated to have fallen by 2 percent in 2013, as a drop in remittances to Egypt more than offset modest growth in the rest of the region. Despite oil prices remaining firm and underpinning the economies of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, departures and deportations from Saudi Arabia and other disruptions are hurting remittance flows. About 300,000 migrants returned to Egypt from Saudi Arabia in the second half of 2013, precipitated by a sharpened labor inspection campaign and set amnesty period. In addition, since November 2013, the Government of Saudi Arabia has deported over 370,000 migrants, mainly nationals of Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Egypt and Yemen. The refugee crisis in Syria continues in staggering proportions. More than 2.5 million Syrians (11 percent of the population) are now living in neighboring countries, with over 1 million in Lebanon alone. Remittance flows to the region are expected to increase modestly to $55 billion in 2016.
Growth in remittances to the South Asia region has slowed, rising by a modest 2.3 percent to $111 billion in 2013, compared with an average annual increase of more than 13 percent during the previous three years. The slowdown was driven by a marginal increase in India of 1.7 percent in 2013, and a decline in Bangladesh of 2.4 percent. The depreciation of the Indian rupee during 2013 appears to have attracted inflows through a surge in the deposits of non-resident Indians rather than remittances. In Bangladesh, the fall in remittances stems from a combination of factors, including fewer migrants finding jobs in the GCC countries, more migrants returning from GCC countries due to departures and deportations, and the appreciation of the Bangladeshi taka against the US dollar. Still, some rebound is projected in the coming years, with remittances across the region forecast to grow to $136 billion in 2016.&
After remaining broadly unchanged in 2012, remittances to Sub-Saharan Africa grew by 3.5 percent in 2013 to reach $32 billion. Flows are forecast to rise to $41 billion in 2016. According to available official data, Nigeria remains the largest recipient by far, with migrants sending about $21 billion in 2013. Remittances to countries in East Africa continued to grow robustly last year, by 10 percent to Kenya and 15 percent to Uganda. In contrast, West African countries, such as Cote d’Ivoire and Senegal, saw only modest increases in 2013, after a slowdown in 2012. Sub-Saharan Africa is one of the few regions in the world where official development assistance is larger than remittances, and both are much more stable than either foreign direct investment or private financing flows. Many countries in the region have large diasporas overseas, with substantial diaspora savings that could be mobilized for development financing.
Media ContactsIn WashingtonIndira
:&+1 (202) 458-0434, +1 (703) 376-7491
For Broadcast RequestsMehreen
A. SheikhTel
:&+1 (202) 458-7336
PRESS RELEASE NO:
PRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE
Christopher Colford
Alvin Etang Ndip
Global Macroeconomics Team
Newsletters}